As a part of this project I am going to include an actual movie review for each movie that I watch and critique. Below I included the Life of Pi review written by Roger Ebert. His review gives an excellent summary of the movie without ruining any of it as well as further illustrating my praise of the film's beauty. Our opinions are very similar, once again giving me hope that I am doing pretty well with this whole movie reviewing thing. Feel free to compare our reviews and enjoy!
LIFE OF PI
By: Roger Ebert
By: Roger Ebert
Ang Lee's "Life of Pi" is a miraculous achievement of
storytelling and a landmark of visual mastery. Inspired by a worldwide
best-seller that many readers must have assumed was unfilmable, it is a triumph
over its difficulties. It is also a moving spiritual achievement, a movie whose
title could have been shortened to "life."
The story
involves the 227 days that its teenage hero spends drifting across the Pacific
in a lifeboat with a Bengal tiger. They find themselves in the same boat after
an amusing and colorful prologue, which in itself could have been enlarged into
an exciting family film. Then it expands into a parable of survival, acceptance
and adaptation. I imagine even Yann Martel, the novel's French-Canadian author,
must be delighted to see how the usual kind of Hollywood manhandling has been
sidestepped by Lee's poetic idealism.
The story begins in a small family zoo
in Pondichery, India, where the boy christened Piscine is raised. Piscine
translates from French to English as "swimming pool," but in an India
where many more speak English than French, his playmates of course nickname him
"pee." Determined to put an end to this, he adopts the name "Pi," demonstrating an uncanny ability to
write down that mathematical constant that begins with 3.14 and never ends. If
Pi is a limitless number, that is the perfect name for a boy who seems to
accept no limitations.
The zoo goes broke, and Pi's father puts his family and
a few valuable animals on a ship bound for Canada. In a bruising series of
falls, a zebra, an orangutan, a hyena and the tiger tumble into the boat with
the boy, and are swept away by high seas. His family is never seen again, and
the last we see of the ship is its lights disappearing into the deep — a
haunting shot that reminds me of the sinking train in Bill Forsyth's "Housekeeping" (1987).
This is a
hazardous situation for the boy (Suraj Sharma), because the film steadfastly
refuses to sentimentalize the tiger (fancifully named "Richard
Parker"). A crucial early scene at the zoo shows that wild animals are
indeed wild and indeed animals, and it serves as a caution for children in the audience,
who must not make the mistake of thinking this is a Disney tiger.
The heart of
the film focuses on the sea journey, during which the human demonstrates that
he can think with great ingenuity and the tiger shows that it can learn. I
won't spoil for you how those things happen. The possibilities are
surprising.
What astonishes me is how much I love the use of 3-D in "Life
of Pi." I've never seen the medium better employed, not even in "Avatar," and although I continue to have
doubts about it in general, Lee never uses it for surprises or sensations, but
only to deepen the film's sense of places and events.
Let me try to describe
one point of view. The camera is placed in the sea, looking up at the lifeboat
and beyond it. The surface of the sea is like the enchanted membrane upon which
it floats. There is nothing in particular to define it; it is just … there.
This is not a shot of a boat floating in the ocean. It is a shot of ocean, boat
and sky as one glorious place.
Still trying not to spoil: Pi and the tiger
Richard Parker share the same possible places in and near the boat. Although
this point is not specifically made, Pi's ability to expand the use of space in
the boat and nearby helps reinforce the tiger's respect for him. The tiger is
accustomed to believing it can rule all space near him, and the human requires
the animal to rethink that assumption.
Most of the footage of the tiger is of
course CGI, although I learn that four real tigers are seen in some shots. The
young actor Suraj Sharma contributes a remarkable performance, shot largely in
sequence as his skin color deepens, his weight falls and deepness and wisdom grow
in his eyes.
The writer W.G. Sebold once wrote, "Men and animals regard
each other across a gulf of mutual incomprehension." This is the case
here, but during the course of 227 days, they come to a form of recognition.
The tiger, in particular, becomes aware that he sees the boy not merely as
victim or prey, or even as master, but as another being.
The movie quietly
combines various religious traditions to enfold its story in the wonder of
life. How remarkable that these two mammals, and the fish beneath them and
birds above them, are all here. And when they come to a floating island
populated by countless meerkats, what an incredible sequence Lee creates
there.
The island raises another question: Is it real? Is this whole story
real? I refuse to ask that question. "Life of Pi" is all real, second
by second and minute by minute, and what it finally amounts to is left for
every viewer to decide. I have decided it is one of the best films of the year.
Here is the link to the above review found on Roger Ebert's site: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20121120/REVIEWS/121129995
Black text on black background...
ReplyDelete